There have been many
attempts to solve under performing schools. No child left behind, as Nicole
Hannah-Jones, doesn’t solve this issue just kinds of masks it. It doesn’t lead
to the change that is needed. Kahne and Westheimer, would agree with Nicole
when she explains that integration is not a charity project for low income
students but the institutional change that is needed. Integration allows low
income students an opportunity to be part of that culture of power, as Deplit
would call it. It gives them the same opportunities that the other better off districts
have. Then they are not limited because of the socioeconomic that they were
born into. Kristof would say that those students in Normandy have been
oppressed because of the institution. It is not the individual student that is
determining their path. It has already been determined by the unaccredited school.
A failing school could only lead to students to go down the path of failure. The
fact that the solution is clear and backed up with concrete evidence but still
not put into practice is frustrating. These kids are the ones whose futures are
at stake. They will be the ones who suffer if this change doesn’t happen soon. Many
are just focused on how to provide a short-term solution. Eliminating the culture of power by it being more inclusive is the perfect
way to solve this issue. Students should not be oppressed by the system; they
must be able to reach their full potential. This can be done with integration.
i love your connections to Delpit and Kristof! I agree!
ReplyDeleteGreat connections to many of the authors we have read. Integration is definitely an institutional change that needs to happen as you stated in your post.
ReplyDeleteHey! Great connect between our other authors, you pointed out some connections I have not noticed before..
ReplyDelete